0%
Back to all blogs

MERN Stack: Is It Still Relevant in 2024?

Md Bakhtier Fahim
March 1, 2024
Web Development7 min read
MERN Stack: Is It Still Relevant in 2024?

The MERN stack has been a popular choice for full-stack developers. But with new technologies on the rise, is it still a viable option in 2024? Let's break it down.

The MERN stack—MongoDB, Express.js, React, and Node.js—has been a go-to technology stack for full-stack JavaScript development for years. As we navigate through 2024, developers are questioning whether MERN remains relevant amid newer technologies.

The Evolution of MERN Components

Each component of the MERN stack has evolved significantly. React has introduced server components and concurrent rendering, MongoDB has enhanced its time series capabilities and search functionality, while Node.js has improved performance and security.

These evolutions have kept the stack modern and capable of handling contemporary development challenges, from real-time applications to complex data processing.

MERN stack architecture diagram

The MERN stack architecture continues to evolve with modern requirements

Competing Stacks and Technologies

New contenders like the T3 stack (TypeScript, tRPC, Tailwind), Next.js with Prisma, and serverless architectures have emerged as alternatives. These options offer different advantages in terms of type safety, performance, and deployment simplicity.

However, MERN's maturity brings benefits in terms of community support, documentation, and proven reliability in production environments—factors that remain crucial for many development teams.

When MERN Still Makes Sense

MERN remains an excellent choice for projects requiring flexible data models, JavaScript throughout the stack, and teams already familiar with its components. It's particularly strong for MVPs and projects that might need to pivot quickly, thanks to MongoDB's schema flexibility.

Many companies continue to invest in MERN, often enhancing it with TypeScript, GraphQL, and modern CI/CD practices to address contemporary development needs while leveraging existing expertise.

Conclusion

While newer options exist, MERN remains relevant by adapting and incorporating modern practices. The choice between MERN and alternatives should depend on specific project requirements, team expertise, and long-term maintenance considerations rather than simply following trends.

Share this article